Achievements
| General Background | Picture Gallery | Examples of Work |
| Project Aims | Achievements | Further Information | News & Events | Natura | Partners |
The project began in February 2002 and ran for
five years, with a total budget of around £4.5 million. This
project required the involvement and co-operation of a large number
of public and private land owners, which was achieved with a
high degree of success and enthusiasm.
The third National Capercaillie Survey was carried
out in the winter of 2004 and has revealed that the population
decline has been halted. In fact, the population has increased
to about 2000 birds! Halting the decline was one of the major
objectives of the LIFE project, so congratulations to all those who
have been working hard on all of the project sites. These
National Capercaillie Surveys are carried out regularly, the next one
is proposed for 2009.
What have we achieved?
Habitat Management:
 |
 |
 |
 |
- 374 Ha of variable density thinning in plantations and glades
created within 45 Ha of forest.
- 97 Ha of heather burning and 170 Ha of heather swiping to
improve brood rearing habitat. - Brash piling over 181 Ha to
improve the provision of ground cover.
- Removal of non-native
species to improve Capercaillie habitat across over 700 Ha. - Capercaillie friendly silvicultural regimes initiated on over
900
Ha. - Predator control around lek sites was carried out
across almost 34,000 Ha of Capercaillie forest during the project. |
 |
 |
|
 |
Management Planning & Stakeholder co-ordination:
|
- Local operational planning groups set up in core
Capercaillie area. - Baseline surveys of
Capercaillie
habitat on over 6,000 Ha.
- Ongoing population monitoring surveys across around
35,000 Ha of forest.
- Management planning work funded to help implement work
across over 25,000 Ha of forest. |
 |
Reducing the risks posed by deer fencing:
 |
 |
|
- 14.6 Km of deer fences removed within SPA's
- 26 Km of
deer fences marked within SPA's
- Ongoing monitoring of over 10 Km of marked deer fences
for evidence of bird strikes.
- Repair and monitoring almost 21 Km of stock fences to
prevent domestic animals grazing in Capercaillie woods. |
 |
 |
Publicity, promotion and recreation:
Project Monitoring Activities undertaken by Forest
Research:
An element of the project includes research work, which has been
ongoing for the past 5 years, to look at the effectiveness of
some of the operational work being carried out through the project.
Examples of the research and monitoring work that has been carried
out during the course of the project are:
1) Predator control: There is clear evidence of the
positive effect of keepering on the presence of target predators
(foxes and corvids), consistent with the objectives of the project.
The policy of using resources on predator removal appears to be
having a significant effect by reducing the potential predation
pressure exerted by these two predators on Capercaillie.
Through site monitoring work, it has been concluded that there is
evidence of the presence of non-target predator species (including
those protected by law) in both keepered and non-keepered sites.
2) Fence removal and marking: Fence marking
has significantly reduced the collision rate of woodland grouse
against fences, and is providing a demonstration of the deployment
and durability of the range of materials. The removal of deer
fences, coupled with predator control on sites of the project, has
greatly reduced the occurrence of adult mortality in Capercaillie.
3) Vegetation thinning: Vegetation thinning
has been carried out as a means of habitat enhancement.
Thinning as a habitat enhancement appears to have been successful.
Results suggest that Blaeberry (V.myrtillus) cover has
increased in plantations where thinning has taken place.
The monitoring suggests that the composition of the ground
vegetation prior to the thinning is important as it can influence
the direction and degree of the response of the different species.
The final judgement on the success of vegetation thinning as a means
of habitat enhancement must await additional time since treatment
and further measurements, although results so far have been very
encouraging.
Further monitoring and research:
Additional monitoring and research projects have been carried out
by other project members. This additional monitoring and
research has and will only further aid the understanding of
successful habitat management, and hopefully, aid in the continued
conservation and recovery of the Capercaillie.
Monitoring Scotland's Capercaillie Population:
|
The National Population Increases The third National
Capercaillie Survey was carried out in the winter of 2004 and
has revealed that the population decline has been halted.
In fact, the population has increased to about 2000 birds!
Halting the decline was one of the major objectives of the LIFE
project, so congratulations to all those who have been working
hard on all of the project sites. These National
Capercaillie Surveys are carried out regularly, the next
one will be in 2010.
|
 |
|
Brood Counts This table summarises brood count work
carried out to 2005 as part of the project. This work is
mainly funded by SNH and carried out by GCT and Dr. Robert Moss.
Breeding success was reasonably good in 2002, but dropped a
little in 2003- possibly due to the extremely dry weather
reducing the amount of insects and water available to chicks.
Disappointingly, breeding success was even worse in 2004 due to
the very cold, wet weather in June. However, breeding
success thankfully increased in 2005.
|
Year
|
No of sites |
Area km2 |
Cocks
|
Hens |
Total no adults |
Broods |
Chicks |
Chicks per hen |
|
2002 |
19 |
75.6 |
69 |
111 |
180 |
57 |
131 |
1.18 |
|
2003 |
24 |
87.0 |
94 |
126 |
220 |
47 |
103 |
0.82 |
|
2004 |
24 |
93.0 |
73 |
127 |
205 |
17 |
34 |
0.27 |
|
2005 |
25 |
89.7 |
86 |
116 |
202 |
202 |
75 |
0.65 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of weather in relation to brood counts (metapopulation
3) This table shows the relationship between rainfall and
the number of chicks per hen located during brood counts on LIFE
project sites. In years with heavy rainfall, productivity
is depressed, even where extensive predator control is
implemented. It is thought that tall, rank ground
vegetation exacerbates the effects of wet weather by wetting
young chicks as they forage, causing them to die of exposure -
Capercaillie chicks cannot thermoregulate for the first fourteen
days.
|
| Year |
June
weather summary |
June
rainfall at Abernethy (mm) |
No sites
counted (same sites) |
Hens |
Chicks |
Broods |
% of
hens with broods |
Chicks
per hen |
| 2002 |
Mild and dry |
30.20 |
8 |
66 |
90 |
37 |
56 |
1.36 |
| 2003 |
Very hot and very dry |
15.95 |
8 |
74 |
56 |
25 |
34 |
1.03 |
| 2004 |
Cold and heavy rain |
127.70 |
8 |
67 |
10 |
6 |
9 |
0.15 |
| 2005 |
Cool with rain |
71.70 |
8 |
70 |
43 |
24 |
34 |
0.61 |
| 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lek Counts This table summarises lek
counts carried out at 44 project sites between 2002 and 2004.
Thanks to the efforts of those involved in the LIFE project, the
numbers of males counted at leks increased again in 2004!
|
Year
|
Number of project leks
counted |
Minimum number of cocks
counted |
Mean
number of cocks per lek |
|
|
44 |
135 |
3.07 |
|
|
44 |
154 |
3.50 |
|
|
44 |
185 |
4.20 |
|
2005 |
44 |
162 |
3.68 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|